Tuesday, November 17, 2009

The Lloyd's Prayer

Our Chairman,
Who Art At Goldman,
Blankfein Be Thy Name.
The Rally’s Come. God’s Work Be Done
On Earth As There’s No Fear Of Correction.
Give Us This Day Our Daily Gains,
And Bankrupt Our Competitors
As You Taught Lehman and Bear Their Lessons.
And Bring Us Not Under Indictment.
For Thine Is The Treasury,
The House And The Senate
Forever and Ever.

I didn't write this and don't know who did, but it is priceless. Lloyd Blankfein is the Chairman of Goldman Sachs, one of the primary beneficiaries of the gov't bailouts (they were substantial counter-parties with AIG on billions of $ of contracts - the bailout of AIG was effectively a bailout of Goldman as well).


Tuesday, November 3, 2009

A Little Perspective on All that Glitters

I've never been a big fan of gold as an investment for a number of reasons. I think it is mostly due to having heard the gold bugs cry wolf for too many years. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, but the gold bugs never seemed to be right and they probably aren't right now either.

This brings us to the current state of affairs with gold at ~$1,060 per Troy ounce and daily headlines screaming about hyper-inflation in the US and gold going to $2,000 per Troy ounce. So I take all of this in and think "Gee, maybe I'm missing something here - maybe I should jump on the wagon with my clients' money while gold is still a bargain at $1,060. Hmmm...am I missing anything?"

Should I go down to my friendly neighborhood gold dealer and buy as many gold bars as I can? Maybe I should bury them in the back yard - it won't rot or tarnish - I can always dig them up later and trade them for a loaf of bread or a gun, right?

Maybe - but if it comes to that, gold won't be worth much either - and the gun owner would probably rather keep his/her gun. I would - you can feed yourself with a gun - you can't eat gold.

Should I recommend to my clients that we move a "modest amount" of their portfolios - say a conservative 5% - into gold? And if I do, what is the best way to do so? There is an Exchange-Traded Fund (symbol: GLD) that says it actually buys gold and stores it. Maybe I should just jump into gold mining stocks or mutual funds?


I've always been a fan of outcomes that are summarized with the phrase: "cooler heads prevailed". Does that mean I miss out on some of the excitement? Undoubtedly my cocktail chatter will be pretty ho-hum. Does that mean I might miss out on some capital gains? Of course I might. But I might also miss out on some capital losses. And if I get in now, what is my signal to get out? $1,500 a Troy ounce? $800 a Troy ounce? A family member bought gold bars back in the 1980's at around $800 a Troy ounce. Many years later I happened to meet the broker and he admitted to me that he "had to eat too" and that he had no regrets about having made that sale.

So I digest all of this conflicting information and I come to the conclusion that 1) boring cocktail chatter beats cocktail sob stories every day (reference: SEC vs. Madoff) , 2) I will never have regret in not buying something, and 3) I will be able to look in the mirror in the morning and know that I made the best decision with the information at hand.

I think there is a bubble in gold and at some point it is going to pop.

Please read the attached article/interview from SeekingAlpha.com for some very insightful perspective on gold.


Questions? kimm@sweetwaterinv.com

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Playing the Game to Win

“The key link between neoclassical economics and game theory was and is rationality. Neoclassical economics is based on the assumption that human beings are absolutely rational in their economic choices. Specifically, the assumption is that each person maximizes her or his rewards -- profits, incomes, or subjective benefits -- in the circumstances that she or he faces.”
- Roger McCain Game Theory: A Nontechnical Introduction to the Analysis of Strategy

Say you are a baseball player at the plate, waiting for the next pitch. You know where you like the ball and the pitcher knows where you like the ball. And you know that he knows where you like the ball and he knows that you know that he knows where you like the ball. We could go on and on. The pitcher is going to try and put the ball where the hitter doesn’t like it but since the hitter knows this, he will attempt to guess where the pitcher is likely to place the ball to improve his chances of making contact. In a nutshell, this is Game Theory – the choices each player makes in a given situation depends in part on his knowledge of the choices available to the other participants in the same situation.

This is what is going on in the housing market and perhaps to a lesser extent, the stock market.

Housing Market
You can divide would-be home buyers into roughly two camps: rational and irrational. The housing market players who stand to benefit from buying activity (e.g., real estate agents, home builders, mortgage brokers, furniture and appliance manufacturers, etc.) are in the irrational camp because they never change their stance. (When was the last time you heard the National Association of Realtors say “Now is a bad time to buy.”? I didn’t think so.)

Rational home buyers are waiting for a better deal: lower prices, lower financing costs, bigger tax breaks, job security, etc. They are essentially applying Game Theory to their decision, in effect waiting for just the right pitch to hit with at least some knowledge of the choices the other players have available. For those that have the patience, waiting is paying off – the deals keep getting better (notice that the Stimulus Bill contained a $8,000 first-time home buyer credit that is a true tax credit, not a loan like the previous $7,500 tax “credit”. We’re also seeing more “discount model” real estate brokerages opening.).

The irrational players continue their mantra that “Now is the best time to buy” on the theory that saying it enough will make it come true. The potential buyers are hoping that they are getting in at the bottom while the other players only care about creating transactions (payday). One could argue that the transactional beneficiaries are rational in that they never change their story but I would argue that the only time the transactional players are rational is when they are laying off employees to bring their expenses in line with their expected revenues.

We’ll see the bottom in the housing market when the majority of rational would-be home buyers decide the pitch is fat enough to take a swing at it, and not before.

Stock Market
Flip to the stock market. Again, you can divide investors into rational and irrational camps. And again, the players who stand to benefit from buying activity (brokerages, banks, custodians, mass media outlets, etc.) are in the irrational camp because they never change their stance. (To test this theory, all one needs do is spend a couple of hours watching CNBC while the markets are open).

Rational investors are waiting for a better deal: lower prices (or trading the swings). Maybe this is market timing behavior, but there is so much cash sitting on the sidelines we can’t discount their patience.

Like the irrational would-be home buyers, the irrational investor camp keeps saying “The bottom is in – now is the time to buy.” These buyers have more fear of missing the up-turn than they do of losing more money by being wrong.

We’ll see the bottom in the stock market when the majority of rational investors decide the pitch is fat enough to take a swing at it, and not before.

Questions? kimm@sweetwaterinv.com

Friday, March 6, 2009

Intelligent Panic

"You'll find more cheer in a graveyard."
- character in “The Two Towers” – J.R.R. Tolkien

“Funerals are for the living.”
- Dear Abby

You watched your 401k account drop -40% in 2008. You thought “Recovery is near, don’t do anything hasty.” In 2009, you’ve watched it drop another -20%. You’ve been thinking “Obama’s in charge now - recovery is at hand, don’t miss out on the turn.” CNBC just ran their “Is The Bottom in?” story for the millionth time. You’ve been pondering the same question. [Is “million” big enough? Maybe we should say “ka-jillion” to denote the new paradigm of REALLY LARGE numbers.]

Today you have the same choices you had in October 2008: you can sell and get out of the way; you can stay put and ride it out (with or without re-balancing); or you can try and trade the market. Make no mistake: this is a trader’s market.

Here are the reasons you are or aren’t following one of these strategies:

1. You haven’t sold because you are convinced you’ll miss The Turn – or – you have sold and gone to cash because you’ve given up on waiting.

2. You have re-balanced because you have a time horizon that will make the current turmoil look like a speed bump in the rear view mirror – or you haven’t re-balanced because you are afraid to sell the only positions in your account that are holding up.

3. You aren’t trading because you don’t know what to do, don’t have the proper tools and probably don’t have the temperament for it – or – you are trading in which case you aren’t reading this anyway. Those with the proper tools, temperament and the courage of their convictions can make money trading in this market.

All of these approaches are valid – only you can decide which one will work for you.

If you believe that the markets will revert to their long-term mean returns given enough time – and you have enough time to give - then the best advice is “do nothing” or “re-balance”. Re-visit your risk tolerance and time horizon and act accordingly. Contact me for a self-scoring Risk Tolerance Questionnaire.

Questions? kimm@sweetwaterinv.com